Technology transfer and commercialization of innovations at Canadian Universities

Autores/as

  • José Carlos Rodríguez Chávez Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Empresariales

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33110/rnee.v4i2.68

Palabras clave:

technology transfer, innovation capabilities, science and technologypolicy

Resumen

This paper analyzes university-industry technology transfer (UITT) and innovationcapabilities development at Canadian universities. In so doing, it discusses theCanadian experience in terms of science and technology policy and UITT. Somegovernmental initiatives both at federal and provincial levels are presented searchingto rank Canada among top countries in the world in terms of R&D and innovativeperformance. The Canadian case might be particularly interesting to analyze inrelation to UITT for several reasons. However, university spin-off creation hasbecome an important mechanism to transfer technology from universities to industrysince it has important impacts on economic value and job creation.

Biografía del autor/a

José Carlos Rodríguez Chávez, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Empresariales

Profesor Investigador del Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Empresariales

Citas

Afshari, A. 2007. The Academic Technology Transfer Landscape in Canada andQuebec in Particular. Proceedings of the 7th National Congress onGovernment-University-Industry Relations for National Development.ACST. 1999. Fortier Report Public Investments in University Research: Reapingthe Benefits. Advisory Council on Science and Technolgy.AUCC. 2002. Framework of Agreed Principles on Federally Funded University Researchbetween the Government of Canada and the Association of Universities andColleges of Canada. AUCC: Ottawa, ON.AUCC. 2005. Momentum: The 2005 Report on University Research and KnowledgeTransfer. AUCC: Ottawa, ON.AUTM. 2004. AUTM Canadian Licensing Survey, FY 2004 Survey Summary.Northbrook IL.Benner, M., and U. Sandstrom. 2000. Institutionalizing the triple helix: Researchfunding and norms in the academic system. Research Policy 29: 291-301.Bercovitz, J., and M. Feldman. 2006. Entrepreneurial universities and technologytransfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge- basedeconomic development. Journal of Technology Transfer 31: 175-188.Bordt, M., and L. Earl. 2003. Public Sector Technology Transfer in Canada 2003.Working Paper. Science, Innovation and Electronic Information Division(SIEID). Statistics Canada.Clarysse, B., M. Wright, A. Lockett, E. van de Velde, A. Vohora. 2005. Spinningout new ventures: A typology of incubation strategies from Europeanresearch institutions. Journal of Business Venturing 20: 183-216.Clayman, B. P. 2004. Technology Transfer at Canadian Universities. Fiscal Year2002 Update. A Report for the Canada Foundation for Innovation.De Koven, N. M. 2004. Primer on Canadian Spin-Off Company Creation. Milton,Geller LLP. Ottawa, ON. Canada.Earl, L., F. Gault, and M. Bordt. 2004. Summary: Meeting on CommercializationMeasurement, Indicators, Gaps and Frameworks. Working Paper. StatisticsCanada: Ottawa, ON.

Djokovic, D., and V. Souitaris. 2008. Spinouts from academic institutions: Aliterature review with suggestions for further research. Journal of TechnologyTransfer 33: 225-247.Gault, F., and S. McDaniel. 2004. Summary: Joint Statistics Canada – Universityof Windsor Workshop on Intellectual Property CommercializationIndicators. Working Paper. Statistics Canada: Windsor, ON.Hanel, P., and A. St.-Pierre. 2006. Industry-university collaboration by Canadianmanufacturing firms. Journal of Technology Transfer 31: 485-499.Hellström, T., and M. Jacob. 2003. Boundary organizations in science: Fromdiscourse to construction. Science and Public Policy 30: 235-238.Henderson, R., A. B. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 1998. Universities as a source ofcommercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting 1965-1988. The Review of Economics and Statistics 80: 119-127.Hindle, K., and J. Yencken. 2004. Public research commercialisation,entrepreneurship and new technology based firms: An integrated model.Technovation 24: 793-803.Industry Canada. 1999b. The Commercialization of University Research in Canada:A Discussion Paper. Innovation and Policy Branch. Industry Canada: Ottawa,Ontario. Canada.Industry Canada. 2002. Achieving Excellence, Investing in People, Knowledge, andOpportunity. Information Distribution Center. Industry Canada: Ottawa,Ontario. Canada.Landry, R., N. Amara, and M. Saïhi. 2007. Patenting and spin-off creation byCanadian researchers in engineering and life sciences. Journal of TechnologyTransfer 32: 217-249.Langford, C. H., J. Hall, P. Josty, S. Matos, and A. Jacobson. 2006. Indicators andoutcomes of Canadian university research: Proxies becoming goals? ResearchPolicy 35: 1586-1598.Library of the Parliament. 2006. Federal Investments in Research and Developmentand Capacity Building in the Higher Education Sector. Library of theParliament: Ottawa, ON.Liljemark, T. 2004. Innovation Policy in Canada: Strategy and Realities. WorkingPaper. Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies.

Mustar, P., M. Renault, M. G. Colombo, E. Piva, M. Fontes, A. Lockett, M. Wright,B. Clarysse, and N. Moray. 2006. Conceptualising the heterogeneity ofresearch-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy. Research Policy35: 289-308.Ndonzuau, F. N., F. Pirnay, and B. Surlemont. 2002. A stage model of academicspin-off creation. Technovation 22: 281-289.Niosi, J. 2006a. Introduction to the symposium: Universities as a source ofcommercial technology. Journal of Technology Transfer 31: 399-402.Niosi, J. 2006b. Success factors in Canadian academic spin-offs. Journal of TechnologyTransfer 31: 451-457.Nlemvo, F., F. Pirnay, and B. Surlemont. 2002. A stage model of academic spin-offcreation. Technovation 22: 281-289.Pirnay, F., B. Surlemont, and F. Nlemvo. 2003. Toward a typology of universityspin-offs. Small Business Economics 21: 355-369.Rasmussen, E. 2008. Government instruments to support the commercializationof university research: Lessons from Canada. Technovation 28: 506-517.Rodríguez, J. C. 2009. University-Industry Technology Transfer in Canada: AnAnalysis of Stakeholders’ Performance Using System Dynamics. Ph. D.Dissertation. Université du Québec à Montréal (UQÀM). Montreal, QC.Canada.Siegel, D. S., D. A. Waldman, A. N. Link. 2003. Improving the effectiveness ofcommercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms. Journal of HighTechnology Management Research 14: 111-133.Siegel, D. S., D. A. Waldman, L. E. Atwater, A. N. Link. 2004. Towards a model ofthe effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians topractitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of universitytechnologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 21: 115-142.Vohora, A., M. Wright, and A. Lockett. 2004. Critical junctures in the developmentof university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy 33: 147-175.Young, T. A. 2007. Establishing a Technology Transfer Office. In Krattiger, A., R.T. Mahoney, and L. Nelson et al. (eds.), Intellectual Property Managementin Health and Agricultural Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices. MIHR:Oxford, U. K., and PIPRA: Davis, U. S. A

Descargas

Publicado

2021-06-10