Social, Economic, Environmental and Cultural Approach

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33110/rnee.v20i2.380

Palabras clave:

Forest-poverty cycle, forest distribution, The world focusing on Durango analysis

Resumen

There is a perverse cycle: the poverty-forest cycle that feeds autonomously and is related to the deterioration of natural resources. Rural areas vary greatly in size and characteristics, depending on the country and region. It is observed how these areas play an essential role in agriculture and the preservation of the natural environment. (Word Bank, 2023). Approximately 250 million people reside in forest and savannah areas, these communities depend on forest products, goods and services for their survival and resilience during times of adversity. Globally, forests cover approximately 4.06 billion hectares, representing the largest area of forests on the planet. Corresponding to approximately 31% of the total surface of the Earth. (FAO, 2020). W. F. (2004) argues that three billion individuals, about half of the world’s population, reside in developing rural areas of the world, and 1,500 million of these survive on less than 2 dollars a day. This area encompasses both native forests and tree plantations. In 2023, approximately 3.42 billion people lived in rural areas, accounting for about 42.66% of the total population. However, the distribution of forests is not homogeneous: more than half of the world’s forests are located in just five nations: Russia, Brazil, Canada, the United States and
China. It is fascinating to observe how these areas play an essential role in agriculture and the preservation of the natural environment. (FAO, 2020). In Durango, deforestation causes environmental damage, but it also increases the supply of agricultural land and generates income and rural employment, sometimes sustainable and sometimes not. There is a trade-off between poverty reduction and environmental protection. The objective is to analyze income and the consequences of poverty and natural resources. No methodology is presented due to the descriptive nature of the study

Citas

BBVA. (2024). Global: Carbon markets to leverage forests for sustainability. BBVA Research. https://www.bbvaresearch.com/en/publicaciones/global-carbon-markets-to-leverage-forests-for-sustainability/

Bourguignon, F., & Pereira da Silva, L. A. (2003). The impact of economic policies on poverty and income distribution: Evaluation techniques and tools. Washington, DC: World Bank; New York, NY:

Oxford University Press. Chomitz, K. M. (2007). At loggerheads? Agricultural expansion, poverty reduction, and the environment in the tropical forests. Washington, DC:

World Bank. CONEVAL. (2023). Poverty measurement 2022: Durango. National Council for the Evaluation of Social Development Policy. https://www.coneval.org.mx

Estrada, R. D (2007). Poverty and soil degradation in the High Andes. The experience of CONDESAN. Contribution 9.

RIMISP electronic publication. “Environmental impact of rural poverty, social impact of environmental deterioration. Evans, M. (2023). Five key challenges facing the world’s trees and forests. CIFOR-ICRAF. Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://forestsnews.cifor.org/88078/cinco-desafios-keys-that-face-the-trees-and-forests-of-the-world?fnl=en Food and Agriculture Organization of the United

Nations (FAO). (2022). The state of the world’s forests 2022: Forests and wood. FAO. ISSN 2521-7569 (online). Retrieved October 2025, from https://www.fao.org Food and Agriculture Organization of the United

Nations (FAO). (2024). The state of the world’s forests 2024: Innovations in the forest sector for a more sustainable future. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://doi.org/10.4060/cd1211es

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2001). Global forest resources assessment 2000. Rome: FAO. (FAO Forestry Paper No. 140).

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2020). Global forest resources assessment 2020: Main report. FAO. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/ca9825en

Hansen, M., & De Fries, R. (2004). Detecting long-term forest change using continuous fields of tree cover maps from 8 km AVHRR data for the years 1982–1999. Ecosystems, 7(7), 695–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-004-0243-3 Hernández-Díaz, J. C. and Nájera-Luna, J. A. (Editors). 2024. Sawn wood production chain in Mexico’s temperate forests and its evolution to the value chain. National Forestry Commission (CONAFOR). Mexico. 201 p.

Hyde, W. F. (2004). The wealth of forests: Markets, regulation, and sustainable forestry. Washington, DC:

Resources for the Future. Hyde, W. F., & Stuart, W. (1999). The U.S. South. In B. Wilson, G. C. van Kooten, & I. Vertinsky (Eds.), Forestry and the environment: Economic perspectives (pp. 259–280). Wallingford, UK:

CAB International. INEGI. (2023). Statistics on poverty in Durango. National Institute of Statistics and Geography. Retrieved October 23, 2024, from https://www.inegi.org.mx/temas/pobreza

Loening, L. J., & Markussen, M. (2003). Poverty, deforestation and their eventual implications for biodiversity in Guatemala. Retrieved April 20, 2024, from https://est.cmq.edu.mx/index.php/est/article/view/428/841

National Forestry Commission. (2017). Overview of REDD+ in Mexico. Available at: REDD+ en México | Comisión Nacional Forestal | Gobierno | gob.mx

REDESMA. (2024). With poverty, there’s no care for the environment. Sustainable Development and Environment Network. Retrieved October 2024, from https://redesma.org/con-poverty-theres-not-care-for-the-environment/Regional

Workshop for Latin America. (2011).

Proceedings of the Regional Workshop for Latin America. Cali, Colombia. Sánchez, J., Domínguez, R., León, M., Samaniego, J., & Sunkel, O. (2019). Natural resources, environment and sustainability: 70 years of ECLAC’s thinking (ECLAC Books, No. 158; LC/PUB.2019/18-P). Santiago, Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

United Nations. (2023). The Millennium Development Goals:

Special edition. United Nations. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. (2000). 1997 RPA: The United States forest resource current situation. Forest Inventory and Analysis Program. Retrieved from http://fia.fs.fed.us/rpa.htm Vertinsky, I., & Arthur, L. (

Eds.). (1999). Forest policy: International case studies. World Bank Policy Research Report. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://www.uncclearn.org/wp-content/uploads/library/unep99_spn_0.pdf

World Bank. (2023). Rural population (% of total population). The World Bank. Retrieved October 20, 2024, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS

Descargas

Publicado

2025-12-09

Cómo citar

Compeán Guzmán, F. J., & Compean Aguirre, J. L. (2025). Social, Economic, Environmental and Cultural Approach. Revista Nicolaita De Estudios Económicos, 20(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.33110/rnee.v20i2.380

Artículos similares

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.